Bibliografia publikacji pracowników
Państwowej Szkoły Wyższej w Białej Podlaskiej
Baza tworzona przez Bibliotekę Akademii Bialskiej im. Jana Pawła II.
Zapytanie:
BEJDA GRZEGORZ Liczba odnalezionych rekordów: 3
Przejście do opcji zmiany formatu | Wyświetl/ukryj etykiety | Wyświetlenie wyników w wersji do druku | Pobranie pliku do edytora | Nowe wyszukiwanie Streszczenie: The COVID-19 pandemic is stressful for pregnant women, their families, and their unborn baby. Aim of the Study: The study aimed to assess the impact of a pandemic on the mental state of women after childbirth. Material and Methods: The study included 363 women hospitalized after delivery. The study used a diagnostic survey method using the proprietary questionnaire and the Family Affluence Scale (FAS), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (DJGLS), The Basic Hope Inventory (BHI-12), and General Self Efficacy Scale (GSES). Results: Suspicion of postpartum depression was found in 109 women (mean: 15.28 ą 2.22)-group I, and no suspicion of it in 254 subjects (mean: 6.03 ą 2.63)-group II. Mean values of the sense of loneliness in group I (27.11 ą 6.00) were higher than in group II (21.35 ą 7.02), and the basic hope-BHI-12, in group I-lower (27.92 ą 5.14) than in group II (31.75 ą 4.97). In the Generalized Own Efficacy Scale, the group I obtained lower mean values (28.07 ą 4.86 points and 5.87 ą 1.96 points) than group II (30.97 ą 3.77 points and 6.02 ą 1 points, 38 sten). Conclusions: As much as 30% of the respondents showed a risk of postpartum depression. The most felt was the limitation of family visits during the hospital stay. In addition, the respondents were most concerned about the child's health in both groups. The feeling of loneliness in group I was higher, and basic hope and generalized self-efficacy were lower than in group II. The differences between these relationships were statistically significant.
2/3
Nr opisu: 0000044655 Autorzy: Agnieszka Kułak-Bejda, Grzegorz Bejda, Elżbieta Krajewska-Kułak, Anna Ślifirczyk, Joanna Chilińska, Alicja Moczydłowska, Napoleon Waszkiewicz, Marek Sobolewski. Tytuł pracy: The influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Women's Feelings during a Hospital Stay Tytuł czasopisma: Szczegóły: 2022, Vol. 19, issue 11, article number 6379 p-ISSN: 1660-4601 Charakterystyka formalna: artykuł w czasopiśmie zagranicznym Charakterystyka merytoryczna: artykuł oryginalny naukowy Charakterystyka wg MNiSW: artykuł w czasopiśmie bez IF (wykaz MEiN) Język publikacji: ENG Punktacja ministerstwa: 140.000 Słowa kluczowe ang.: COVID-19 ; depression ; hope ; pandemic ; self-efficiacy ; stress ; women https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6379 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116379 Streszczenie: The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) affected individuals and society and caused disruption, anxiety, stress, and loneliness. Being hospitalized during the pandemic increase a patient's negative feelings. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients' feelings (loneliness, depression, hope, self-efficacy) during a hospital stay. Materials and methods: This study included 207 women, aged from 15 to 83 years (55 ą 21.2) that were hospitalized during the pandemic in Białystok, Łomża, and Biała Podlaska, Poland at internal medicine departments. The main reasons for hospitalization were cardiovascular diseases, abdominal pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, diabetes, and unknown fever. Respondents were asked to complete the following questionnaires: Sense of Loneliness (the DJGLS), Depression Beck Inventory (BDI), Basic Hope (BHI-12), and Self-Efficacy (GSES). Results: Most of the studied group of women had an average sense of loneliness. A greater sense of loneliness was found among hospitalized women living in the countryside-the lowest sense of loneliness and depression was among women with higher education and the highest sense of effectiveness. One-third of respondents had a moderate degree of depression. Of the respondents, 39% had a relatively high level of basic hope. The assessment of self-efficacy demonstrated that 52% of the respondents showed a high sense of self-efficacy, an average sense of self-efficacy was shown by 35.5% of the respondents, and a low sense of self-efficacy was shown by 12.6% of the respondents. Conclusions: Numerous hospitalized women during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite experiencing moderate depression, had an average sense of loneliness and a high level of hope and self-efficacy.
3/3
Nr opisu: 0000035588 Autorzy: Agnieszka Kułak-Bejda, Grzegorz Bejda, Teresa Michalczuk, Paweł Piszcz, Anna Ślifirczyk. Tytuł pracy: Potrzeba edukacji chorych psychicznie i ich rodzin oraz bariery w powyższym w percepcji pielęgniarek Tytuł całości: W: Holistyczny wymiar współczesnej medycyny, T. IV / pod red. Elżbiety Krajewskiej-Kułak, Cecylii Reginy Łukaszuk, Jolanty Lewko, Wojciecha Kułaka Miejsce wydania: Białystok Wydawca: Uniwersytet Medyczny w Białymstoku Rok wydania: 2018 Strony zajęte przez pracę: S. 1287-1300 ISBN: 978-83-948644-0-8 Charakterystyka formalna: rozdział w monografii polskiej Charakterystyka wg MNiSW: rozdział w monografii - j. polski lub innym poza kongres. Język publikacji: POL Praca recenzowana Słowa kluczowe: chorzy psychicznie ; edukacja ; bariery ; pielęgniarki Uwaga: Kopia dostepna w Sekcji Bibliometrii https://www.umb.edu.pl/photo/pliki/Dziekanat-WNOZ/monografie/2018-holistyczna-tom-iv.pdf
